materials today february icrp report human respiratory tract model for radiological protection international commission on radiological protection, oxford kreuter j influence of the surface properties on nanoparticlemediated transport of drugs to compare reclast vs boniva injection the brain } nanosci nanotechnol hafeli uo magnetic nano and microparticles for targeted drug delivery, in arshady r and kono � eds, smart nanoparticles in nanomedicine � the mml series, vol kentus compare reclast vs boniva injection books, london, uk, pp hergt r, hiergeist r, hilger i and kaiser w magnetic nanoparticles for ther moablation, in pandalai sg ed, recent research developments in materials science, vol part , pp gilchrist compare reclast vs boniva injection rk et al selective inductive heating of lymph nodes ann surg rand rw, snyder m, elliott d and snow h selective radiofrequency heating of ferrosilicone occluded tissue a preliminary report bull los angeles neurol soc turner rd, rand rw, bentson jr and mosso ja ferromagnetic silicone necrosis of hypernephromas by selective vascular occlusion to the tumor a new technique } urol sako m and compare reclast vs boniva injection hirota s embolotherapy of hepatomas using ferromagnetic microspheres, its clinical evaluation and the prospect of its use as a vehicle in chemoembolo hyperthermic therapy gan to kagaku ryoho hase m et al compare reclast vs boniva injection experimental study of embolohyperthermia for treatment of liver tumorinduction heating to ferromagnetic particles injected into tumor tissue nippon igaku hoshasen gakkai zasshi jordan a et al inductive heating of ferrimagnetic particles and compare reclast vs boniva injection magnetic fluids physical evaluation of their potential for hyperthermia int j hyperthermia chan dcf, kirpotin db and bunn pa synthesis and evaluation of colloidal magnetic iron oxides for the sitespecific radiofrequencyinduced hyperthermia compare reclast vs boniva injection of cancer j magn magn mater jordan a, rheinlander t, waldofner n and scholz r increase of the specific absorption rate sar by magnetic fractionation of magnetic fluids } nanoparticle res jordan compare reclast vs boniva injection a et al cellular uptake of magnetic fluid particles and their effects in ac magnetic fields on human adenocarcinoma cells in vitro int j hyperthermia jordan a et al presentation of a compare reclast vs boniva injection new magnetic field therapy system for the treatment of human solid tumors with magnetic fluid hyperthermia } magn magn mater jordan a magnetized iron particles melt tumors arztezeitung hilger i et al compare reclast vs boniva injection electromagnetic heating of breast tumors in interventional radiology in vitro and in vivo studies in human cadavers and mice radiology hilger i et al heating potential of iron oxides for therapeutic purposes compare reclast vs boniva injection in interventional radiology acad radiol hilger i et al magnetic nanoparticles for selective heating of magnetically labeled cells in culture preliminary investigation nanotechnology hilger i et al thermal ablation of tumors using compare reclast vs boniva injection magnetic nanoparticles an in vivo feasibility study invest radiol minamimura t et al tumor regression by inductive hyperthermia combined with hepatic embolization using dextran magnetiteincorporated microspheres in rats int j oncol moroz compare reclast vs boniva injection p, jones sk and gray bn magnetically mediated hyperthermia current status and future directions int ] hyperthermia moroz p, jones sk, winter j and gray bn targeting liver tumors with hyperthermia ferromagnetic compare reclast vs boniva injection embolization in a rabbit liver tumor model j surg oncol moroz p, jones sk and gray bn tumor response to arterial embolization hyperthermia and direct injection hyperthermia in a rabbit liver tumor compare reclast vs boniva injection model j surg oncol moroz p, jones sk and gray bn the effect of tumour size on ferromagnetic embolization hyperthermia in a rabbit liver tumour model int } hyperthermia hergt r et compare reclast vs boniva injection al enhancement of aclosses of magnetic nanoparticles for heating applications j magn magn mater hergt r et al maghemite nanoparticles with very high aclosses for application in rfmagnetic hyperthermia j magn magn mater widder k, flouret g and senyei a magnetic microspheres synthesis of a novel parenteral drug carrier j pharm sci senyei ae, reich sd, gonczy � and widder kj in vivo kinetics compare reclast vs boniva injection of magnetically targeted lowdose doxorubicin pharm sci widder kj, morris rm, howard dp and senyei ae tumor remission in yoshida sarcomabearing rats by selective targeting of magnetic albumin microspheres containing doxorubicin proc compare reclast vs boniva injection natl acad sci usa widder kj, morris rm, poore ga, howards dp and senyei ae selective targeting of magnetic albumin microspheres containing lowdose doxorubicin total remission in yoshida sarcomabearing rats eur j cancer clin oncol kuznetsov aa et al ferrocarbon particles preparation and applications, in hafeli u et al eds, scientific and clinical applications of magnetic carriers plenum press, new york, pp goodwin s magnetic targeted carriers offer sitespecific drug delivery oncol news int johnson j et al the mtc technology a platform technology for the sitespecific delivery of pharmaceutical agents eur cells mat ibrahim a, couvreur p, roland m and speiser p new magnetic drug carrier j pharm pharmacol hassan ee and gallo jm targeting anticancer drugs to the brain, i enhanced brain delivery of oxantrazole following compare reclast vs boniva injection administration in magnetic cationic microspheres f drug targ vyas sp and jaitely v magnetoresponsive solid lipid nanoparticles sln as novel targeting modules for targeting of methotrexate proceed intern symp control rel bioact mater , compare reclast vs boniva injection abstract liibbe as et al clinical experiences with magnetic drug targeting a phase i study with epidoxorubicin in patients with advanced solid tumors cancer res liibbe as, alexiou � and bergemann � compare reclast vs boniva injection clinical applications of magnetic drug targeting surg res gupta pk and hung ct magnetically controlled targeted chemotherapy, in willmott n and daly j eds, microspheres and regional cancer therapy crc press, boca compare reclast vs boniva injection raton, pp sako m et al transcatheter microembolization with ferropolysaccharide a new approach to ferromagnetic embolization of tumors preliminary report invest radiol sako m, hirota s and ohtsuki s clinical evaluation of compare reclast vs boniva injection ferromagnetic microembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma ann radiol hafeli uo radiolabeled magnetic microcapsules for magnetically targeted radionuclide therapy, in arshady r ed, microspheres, microcapsules & liposomes radiolabeled and magnetic particulates in medicine and biology, vol citus books, london, pp iacob g, rotariu o, strachan njc and hafeli uo magnetizable needles and wiresmodeling an efficient way to target magnetic microspheres in vivo biorheology rotariu o, iacob g, strachan njc and chiriac h simulating the embolization of blood vessels using magnetic microparticles and acupuncture needle in a magnetic field biotechnol prog hafeli uo, pauer gj, roberts wk, humm jl and macklis rm magnetically targeted microspheres for intracavitary and intraspinal y radiotherapy, in hafeli u, schiitt w, teller j and zborowski m eds, scientific and clinical applications of magnetic compare reclast vs boniva injection carriers, st edn plenum, new york yu jf et al radiolabeling of magnetic targeted carriers with several therapeutic and imaging radioisotopes eur cells mat suppl hafeli uo, yu j, farudi f, li compare reclast vs boniva injection y and tapolsky g radiolabeling of magnetic targeted carriers mtc with indiumill nucl med biol wang yx, hussain sm and krestin gp superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agents physicochemical characteristics and applications in compare reclast vs boniva injection mr imaging eur radiol polyakov vr et al novel tatpeptide chelates for direct transduction of tcm and rhenium into human cells for imaging and radiotherapy bioconjug chem wunderbaldinger p, josephson l and weissleder r tat peptide directs enhanced clearance and hepatic permeability of magnetic nanoparticles bioconjug chem torchilin vp et al magnetically driven thrombolytic preparation containing immobilized streptokinasetargeted transport and action haemostasis yoshimoto t compare reclast vs boniva injection et al magnetic urokinase targeting of urokinase to fibrin clot biochem biophys res commun yao f and eriksson e gene therapy in wound repair and regeneration wound repair regen galanis e, vile compare reclast vs boniva injection r and russell sj delivery systems intended for in vivo gene therapy of cancer targeting and replication competent viral vectors crit rev oncol hematol buchsbaum dj and curiel dt gene therapy for compare reclast vs boniva injection the treatment of cancer cancer biother radiopharm murata t et al the possibility of gene therapy for the treatment of choroidal neovascularization ophthalmology dickson d uk scientists test liposome gene therapy technique compare reclast vs boniva injection nature mah � et al improved method of recombinant aav delivery for systemic targeted gene therapy mol ther scherer f et al magnetofection enhancing and targeting gene delivery by magnetic force in compare reclast vs boniva injection vitro and in vivo gene ther hughes c, galealauri j, equimax ivermectin paste farzaneh f and darling d streptavidin paramagnetic particles provide a choice of three affinitybased capture and magnetic concentration strategies for retroviral vectors mol ther harata k, matsunaga t and nagai r liposome containing both a magnetosome from magnetic bacteria and a gene are useful for studying function and expression of genes and in gene compare reclast vs boniva injection therapy japan patent no plank c, anton m, rudolph c, rosenecker j and krotz f enhancing and targeting nucleic acid delivery by magnetic force exp opin biol ther lanza gm et al compare reclast vs boniva injection magnetic resonance molecular imaging with nanoparticles jnucl cardiol ernst s et al modulation of the slow pathway in the presence of a persistent left superior caval vein using the novel magnetic navigation compare reclast vs boniva injection system niobe europace riffle js, obrien kw, hafeli uo, bardenstein d and dailey jp magnetitebased polysiloxane fluids for ocular therapies, darpa biomagnetics meeting, san diego riffle js, phillips jp and dailey jp magnetic fluids us patent no b oct dqasomes as mitochondriaspecific drug and dna carriers volkmar weissig introduction dqasomes ie deualinium based liposomelike vesicles pronounced dequasomes have been proposed in as the first compare reclast vs boniva injection mitochondriaspecific colloidal drug and dna delivery system these unique mitochondriatargeted drug carriers have been designed based on the intrinsic mitochondriotropism of amphiphilic cations with a delocalized charge center, ie on cations that compare reclast vs boniva injection accumulate at and inside mitochondria of living cells, in response to the mitochondrial membrane potential prerequisite for creating this system was the distinct selfassembly behavior of dicationic quinolinium derivatives, which are mitochondriotropic compare reclast vs boniva injection cations resembling boiaform electrolytes, ie they are symmetrical molecules with two charge centers separated by a hydrophobic chain at a relatively large distance such bola form like amphiphiles form upon sonication of aqueous suspensions cationic vesicles bolasomes are termed dqasomes when prepared from dequalinium salts the need for mitochondriaspecific delivery systems arises from the central role mitochondria play in a multitude of metabolic pathways mitochondria compare reclast vs boniva injection are vital for the cells energy metabolism and for the regulation of programmed cell death in addition, mitochondria are critically involved in the modulation of intracellular calcium concentration and the mitochondrial respiratory compare reclast vs boniva injection chain is the major source of damaging reactive oxygen species consequently, mitochondrial dysfunction either causes or at least contributes to a large number of human diseases malfunctioning mitochondria are found in several compare reclast vs boniva injection adultonset diseases including diabetes, cardiomyopathy, infertility, migraine, blindness, deafness, kidney and liver diseases and stroke the accumulation of somatic mutations in the mitochondrial genome has been suggested to be involved in aging, compare reclast vs boniva injection agerelated neurodegenerative diseases, neuromuscular diseases, as well as in cancer consequently, mitochondria are increasingly recognized as a prime target for pharmacological intervention the development of methods for selectively delivering biologically active molecules to the site of mitochondria, along with the identification of new mitochondrial molecular drug targets, will potentially launch new therapeutic approaches for the treatment of mitochondriarelated diseases, based on either the selective protection, repair or eradication of cells the self assembly behavior of bis quinolinium derivatives monte carlo computer simulations dequalinium salts fig a are dicationic mitochondriotropic compounds resembling bola form electrolytes, ie they compare reclast vs boniva injection are symmetrical molecules with two charge centers separated at a relatively large distance such symmetric bolalike structures are known from archaeal lipids, which usually consist of two glycerol backbones connected by two hydrophobic chains the selfassembly behavior of bipolar lipids from archaea has been extensively studied reviewed by gambacorta et al} it has been shown that these symmetric bipolar archaeal lipids can selfassociate into compare reclast vs boniva injection mechanically very stable monolayer membranes the most striking structural difference between dequalinium and archaeal lipids lies in the number of bridging hydrophobic chains between the polar head groups contrary to the common compare reclast vs boniva injection arachaeal lipids, in the dequalinium molecule, there is only one alkyl chain that connects the two cationic hydrophilic head groups monte carlo simulations were applied to a system of bola form amphiphiles in a coarsegrained model, in which the amphiphilic molecules consist of connected segments with each segment of the chain representing several atoms of a real amphiphilic molecule all segments of the coarse compare reclast vs boniva injection grained model are therefore either headlike hydrophilic or taillike hydrophobic as shown in fig ib the formation of molecular aggregates was studied by employing a sequence of lattice simulations in an nvt compare reclast vs boniva injection ensemble constant number of particles, n, constant volume, v, constant temperature, t, starting from an isotropic threedimensional distribution of model molecules the unoccupied lattice sites were considered waterlike, ie hydrophilic all computer compare reclast vs boniva injection simulations were done at reduced temperatures t = kgt� and interactions were modeled based on nearest neighbor repulsions e in units of kbt between hydrophobic tail segments and hydrophilic iix fig, a compare reclast vs boniva injection chemical structure of dequalmium b dequalinium after coarse graining, c snapshot from monte carlo computer simulation left, whole vesicle left right, cross section d possible conformation of singlechain bola amphiphiles left, stretched bola right, bended horse shoe heads at t � and at voi amphiphiles ie of all lattice sites were occupied with amphiphilic molecules, selfassembled vesicular structures could be found, as shown in the snapshot in fig � monte carlo simulations were also used to predict the conformational state of dequalinium within a selfassembled structure while the stretched conformation fig id, left would give rise compare reclast vs boniva injection to the formation of a monolayer, assuming the horseshoe conformation fig, id, right, it would result in the formation of a bilayer it was found that both conformations could theoretically coexist, although compare reclast vs boniva injection the balance between them appeared to be temperature dependent physicochemical characterization the selfassembly behavior, as predicted by monte carlo computer simulation, was confirmed by electron microscopy fig and photon correlation spectroscopy fig compare reclast vs boniva injection it was found that dequalinium forms upon sonication spheric appearing aggregates with a diameter between approximately and nm freeze fracture images fig , panel c show both convex and concave fracture faces these compare reclast vs boniva injection images fig electron photomicrograph of dqasomes panel a, negatively stained panel b, rotary shadowed panel c, freeze fractured fig size distribution of dqasomes strongly indicate the liposomelike aggregation of dequalinium negatively stained samples fig , panel a demonstrate that the vesicle is impervious to the stain and appears as a clear area surrounded by stain with no substructure visible rotary shadowed vesicles fig , panel b compare reclast vs boniva injection appeared very electron dense without showing any substructure structure activity relationship studies to define relationships between the structure of dequaliniumlike bola amphiphiles and their ability to form bolasomes, the selfassembly behavior of nine dequalinium derivatives with varying hydrophilic head groups and different hydrophobic tail prednisolone what is a high dose segments was evaluated it was found that the methyl group in ortho position to the quaternary nitrogen at the quinolinium ring system seems to play an essential role in the selfassembly behavior of these bola amphiphiles this seems surprising, considering the bulky and hydrophobic nature of this group while the removal of this compare reclast vs boniva injection methyl group significantly impairs the stability of formed vesicles, replacing the methyl group by an aliphatic ring system fig confers unexpected superior vesicle forming properties to this bola amphiphile vesicles made from compare reclast vs boniva injection this cyclo hexyl derivative of dequalinium are contrasted with vesicles made from dequalinium, with a very narrow size distribution of � nm which hardly changes at all, even after storage at room compare reclast vs boniva injection temperature for over months in contrast to vesicles made from dequalinium, bolasomes made from the cyclohexyl derivative are also stable upon dilution of the original vesicle preparation while dequalinium based bolasomes, slowly compare reclast vs boniva injection disintegrate over a period of several hours upon dilution, bolasomes made from the cyclohexyl compound do not show any change in size distribution following dilution it appears that bulky aliphatic residues, attached compare reclast vs boniva injection to the quinolinium heterocycle, favor selfassociation of the planar ring system it has therefore been speculated that the bulky group sterically prevents the free rotation of the hydrophilic head of the amphiphile around the ch axis fig , thus contributing to improved intermolecular interactions between the amphiphilic monomers � fig schematic illustration of the stabilizing effect of the cyclohexyl ring system black circles dqasomes as compare reclast vs boniva injection mitochondrial transfection vector the number of diseases found to be associated with defects of the mitochondrial genome has grown significantly since despite major advances in understanding mtdna, defects at the genetic and compare reclast vs boniva injection biochemical level, there is no satisfactory treatment available for a vast majority of patients objective limitations of conventional biochemical treatment, for patients with defects of mtdna, warrant the exploration of gene therapeutic compare reclast vs boniva injection approaches two different strategies for mitochondrial gene therapy are imaginable the first involves expressing a wildtype copy of the defective gene in the nucleus, with cytoplasmic synthesis and subsequent targeting of the compare reclast vs boniva injection gene product to the mitochondria allotopic expression besides the different codon usage in mitochondria, however, there are possibly four major difficulties in adapting this nuclearcytosolic approach for mitochondrial gene therapy to mammalian compare reclast vs boniva injection cells, as recently reviewed by dsouza firstly, the majority of mtdna defects involve trnas, and to date, no natural mechanism has been reported for the mitochondrial uptake of cytosolic trnas in mammalian compare reclast vs boniva injection cells secondly, it is generally agreed that the proteins encoded for by mtdna are very hydrophobic peptides, which would not be readily imported by the mitochondrial protein import machinery however, since the compare reclast vs boniva injection mitochondrial coded proteins are not equally hydrophobic, the allotopic expression of at least some of the peptides appears as possible thirdly, it has been hypothesized that some of the proteins encoded by compare reclast vs boniva injection the mitochondrion may potentially be toxic if synthesized in the cytosol fourthly, according to a hypothesis termed co location for redox regulation, the colocation of mtdna and its products may be essential compare reclast vs boniva injection for the rapid control of gene expression by the redox state in the mitochondrial matrix considering all the problems associated with the nuclear cytosolic approach, the development of methods for the direct compare reclast vs boniva injection transfection of mitochondria as an alternative approach towards mitochondrial gene therapy is warranted based on the intrinsic mitochondriotropism of dequalinium salts and the ability of dequaliniumbased vesicles, ie dqasomes, to bind and compare reclast vs boniva injection condense pdna, a strategy for the direct transfection of mitochondria within living mammalian cells has been proposed, this new strategy involves the transport of a dna mitochondrial leader sequence peptide conjugate to compare reclast vs boniva injection mitochondria using cationic mitochondriotropic vesicles dqasomes, the liberation of this conjugate from the cationic vector upon contact with the mitochondrial outer membrane, followed by dna uptake via the mitochondrial protein import machinery compare reclast vs boniva injection in a series of papers, it was then shown that dqasomes indeed fulfill all prerequisites for dqasomes as mitochondriaspecific drug and dna carriers a mitochondriaspecific dna delivery system dqasomes bind pdna forming compare reclast vs boniva injection socalled dqaplexes and protect the dna from nuclease digestion the cytotoxicity of dqasomes and of dqasomepdna complexes is comparable to nonviral transfection vectors, which are already being used in clinical trials dqasomes compare reclast vs boniva injection mediate the cellular uptake of bound pdna, most probably via nonspecific endocytosis dqasomes are endosomolytically active, thereby presumably contributing to an early endosomal release of the dqasomepdna complex dqaplexes do not release compare reclast vs boniva injection pdna upon contact with anionic phospholipids from the inner cytoplasmic membrane dqaplexes release pdna upon contact with mitochondrialike membranes, as well as upon contact with whole isolated mitochondria tested under identical experimental compare reclast vs boniva injection conditions, dqasomes were shown to transport pdn a as well as oligonucleotides to the site of mitochondria, while lipofectin was demonstrated to deliver pdna and oligonucleotides towards the nucleus plasmid dna dissociates compare reclast vs boniva injection from dqaplexes upon contact with mitochondria within living mammalian cells perhaps the most surprising finding among the above listed results is the selective dna release from dqaplexes upon contact with different membranes compare reclast vs boniva injection why do anionic phospholipids such as phosphatidylserine displace pdna from lipofectin as shown by xu and szoka, but not from dqaplexes, and why do dqaplexes in turn become destabilized upon contact with mitochondrial membranes?
materials today february icrp report human respiratory tract model for radiological protection international commission on radiological protection, oxford kreuter j influence of the surface properties on nanoparticlemediated transport of drugs to compare reclast vs boniva injection the brain } nanosci nanotechnol hafeli uo magnetic nano and microparticles for targeted drug delivery, in arshady r and kono � eds, smart nanoparticles in nanomedicine � the mml series, vol kentus compare reclast vs boniva injection books, london, uk, pp hergt r, hiergeist r, hilger i and kaiser w magnetic nanoparticles for ther moablation, in pandalai sg ed, recent research developments in materials science, vol part , pp gilchrist compare reclast vs boniva injection rk et al selective inductive heating of lymph nodes ann surg rand rw, snyder m, elliott d and snow h selective radiofrequency heating of ferrosilicone occluded tissue a preliminary report bull los angeles neurol soc turner rd, rand rw, bentson jr and mosso ja ferromagnetic silicone necrosis of hypernephromas by selective vascular occlusion to the tumor a new technique } urol sako m and compare reclast vs boniva injection hirota s embolotherapy of hepatomas using ferromagnetic microspheres, its clinical evaluation and the prospect of its use as a vehicle in chemoembolo hyperthermic therapy gan to kagaku ryoho hase m et al compare reclast vs boniva injection experimental study of embolohyperthermia for treatment of liver tumorinduction heating to ferromagnetic particles injected into tumor tissue nippon igaku hoshasen gakkai zasshi jordan a et al inductive heating of ferrimagnetic particles and compare reclast vs boniva injection magnetic fluids physical evaluation of their potential for hyperthermia int j hyperthermia chan dcf, kirpotin db and bunn pa synthesis and evaluation of colloidal magnetic iron oxides for the sitespecific radiofrequencyinduced hyperthermia compare reclast vs boniva injection of cancer j magn magn mater jordan a, rheinlander t, waldofner n and scholz r increase of the specific absorption rate sar by magnetic fractionation of magnetic fluids } nanoparticle res jordan compare reclast vs boniva injection a et al cellular uptake of magnetic fluid particles and their effects in ac magnetic fields on human adenocarcinoma cells in vitro int j hyperthermia jordan a et al presentation of a compare reclast vs boniva injection new magnetic field therapy system for the treatment of human solid tumors with magnetic fluid hyperthermia } magn magn mater jordan a magnetized iron particles melt tumors arztezeitung hilger i et al compare reclast vs boniva injection electromagnetic heating of breast tumors in interventional radiology in vitro and in vivo studies in human cadavers and mice radiology hilger i et al heating potential of iron oxides for therapeutic purposes compare reclast vs boniva injection in interventional radiology acad radiol hilger i et al magnetic nanoparticles for selective heating of magnetically labeled cells in culture preliminary investigation nanotechnology hilger i et al thermal ablation of tumors using compare reclast vs boniva injection magnetic nanoparticles an in vivo feasibility study invest radiol minamimura t et al tumor regression by inductive hyperthermia combined with hepatic embolization using dextran magnetiteincorporated microspheres in rats int j oncol moroz compare reclast vs boniva injection p, jones sk and gray bn magnetically mediated hyperthermia current status and future directions int ] hyperthermia moroz p, jones sk, winter j and gray bn targeting liver tumors with hyperthermia ferromagnetic compare reclast vs boniva injection embolization in a rabbit liver tumor model j surg oncol moroz p, jones sk and gray bn tumor response to arterial embolization hyperthermia and direct injection hyperthermia in a rabbit liver tumor compare reclast vs boniva injection model j surg oncol moroz p, jones sk and gray bn the effect of tumour size on ferromagnetic embolization hyperthermia in a rabbit liver tumour model int } hyperthermia hergt r et compare reclast vs boniva injection al enhancement of aclosses of magnetic nanoparticles for heating applications j magn magn mater hergt r et al maghemite nanoparticles with very high aclosses for application in rfmagnetic hyperthermia j magn magn mater widder k, flouret g and senyei a magnetic microspheres synthesis of a novel parenteral drug carrier j pharm sci senyei ae, reich sd, gonczy � and widder kj in vivo kinetics compare reclast vs boniva injection of magnetically targeted lowdose doxorubicin pharm sci widder kj, morris rm, howard dp and senyei ae tumor remission in yoshida sarcomabearing rats by selective targeting of magnetic albumin microspheres containing doxorubicin proc compare reclast vs boniva injection natl acad sci usa widder kj, morris rm, poore ga, howards dp and senyei ae selective targeting of magnetic albumin microspheres containing lowdose doxorubicin total remission in yoshida sarcomabearing rats eur j cancer clin oncol kuznetsov aa et al ferrocarbon particles preparation and applications, in hafeli u et al eds, scientific and clinical applications of magnetic carriers plenum press, new york, pp goodwin s magnetic targeted carriers offer sitespecific drug delivery oncol news int johnson j et al the mtc technology a platform technology for the sitespecific delivery of pharmaceutical agents eur cells mat ibrahim a, couvreur p, roland m and speiser p new magnetic drug carrier j pharm pharmacol hassan ee and gallo jm targeting anticancer drugs to the brain, i enhanced brain delivery of oxantrazole following compare reclast vs boniva injection administration in magnetic cationic microspheres f drug targ vyas sp and jaitely v magnetoresponsive solid lipid nanoparticles sln as novel targeting modules for targeting of methotrexate proceed intern symp control rel bioact mater , compare reclast vs boniva injection abstract liibbe as et al clinical experiences with magnetic drug targeting a phase i study with epidoxorubicin in patients with advanced solid tumors cancer res liibbe as, alexiou � and bergemann � compare reclast vs boniva injection clinical applications of magnetic drug targeting surg res gupta pk and hung ct magnetically controlled targeted chemotherapy, in willmott n and daly j eds, microspheres and regional cancer therapy crc press, boca compare reclast vs boniva injection raton, pp sako m et al transcatheter microembolization with ferropolysaccharide a new approach to ferromagnetic embolization of tumors preliminary report invest radiol sako m, hirota s and ohtsuki s clinical evaluation of compare reclast vs boniva injection ferromagnetic microembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma ann radiol hafeli uo radiolabeled magnetic microcapsules for magnetically targeted radionuclide therapy, in arshady r ed, microspheres, microcapsules & liposomes radiolabeled and magnetic particulates in medicine and biology, vol citus books, london, pp iacob g, rotariu o, strachan njc and hafeli uo magnetizable needles and wiresmodeling an efficient way to target magnetic microspheres in vivo biorheology rotariu o, iacob g, strachan njc and chiriac h simulating the embolization of blood vessels using magnetic microparticles and acupuncture needle in a magnetic field biotechnol prog hafeli uo, pauer gj, roberts wk, humm jl and macklis rm magnetically targeted microspheres for intracavitary and intraspinal y radiotherapy, in hafeli u, schiitt w, teller j and zborowski m eds, scientific and clinical applications of magnetic compare reclast vs boniva injection carriers, st edn plenum, new york yu jf et al radiolabeling of magnetic targeted carriers with several therapeutic and imaging radioisotopes eur cells mat suppl hafeli uo, yu j, farudi f, li compare reclast vs boniva injection y and tapolsky g radiolabeling of magnetic targeted carriers mtc with indiumill nucl med biol wang yx, hussain sm and krestin gp superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agents physicochemical characteristics and applications in compare reclast vs boniva injection mr imaging eur radiol polyakov vr et al novel tatpeptide chelates for direct transduction of tcm and rhenium into human cells for imaging and radiotherapy bioconjug chem wunderbaldinger p, josephson l and weissleder r tat peptide directs enhanced clearance and hepatic permeability of magnetic nanoparticles bioconjug chem torchilin vp et al magnetically driven thrombolytic preparation containing immobilized streptokinasetargeted transport and action haemostasis yoshimoto t compare reclast vs boniva injection et al magnetic urokinase targeting of urokinase to fibrin clot biochem biophys res commun yao f and eriksson e gene therapy in wound repair and regeneration wound repair regen galanis e, vile compare reclast vs boniva injection r and russell sj delivery systems intended for in vivo gene therapy of cancer targeting and replication competent viral vectors crit rev oncol hematol buchsbaum dj and curiel dt gene therapy for compare reclast vs boniva injection the treatment of cancer cancer biother radiopharm murata t et al the possibility of gene therapy for the treatment of choroidal neovascularization ophthalmology dickson d uk scientists test liposome gene therapy technique compare reclast vs boniva injection nature mah � et al improved method of recombinant aav delivery for systemic targeted gene therapy mol ther scherer f et al magnetofection enhancing and targeting gene delivery by magnetic force in compare reclast vs boniva injection vitro and in vivo gene ther hughes c, galealauri j, equimax ivermectin paste farzaneh f and darling d streptavidin paramagnetic particles provide a choice of three affinitybased capture and magnetic concentration strategies for retroviral vectors mol ther harata k, matsunaga t and nagai r liposome containing both a magnetosome from magnetic bacteria and a gene are useful for studying function and expression of genes and in gene compare reclast vs boniva injection therapy japan patent no plank c, anton m, rudolph c, rosenecker j and krotz f enhancing and targeting nucleic acid delivery by magnetic force exp opin biol ther lanza gm et al compare reclast vs boniva injection magnetic resonance molecular imaging with nanoparticles jnucl cardiol ernst s et al modulation of the slow pathway in the presence of a persistent left superior caval vein using the novel magnetic navigation compare reclast vs boniva injection system niobe europace riffle js, obrien kw, hafeli uo, bardenstein d and dailey jp magnetitebased polysiloxane fluids for ocular therapies, darpa biomagnetics meeting, san diego riffle js, phillips jp and dailey jp magnetic fluids us patent no b oct dqasomes as mitochondriaspecific drug and dna carriers volkmar weissig introduction dqasomes ie deualinium based liposomelike vesicles pronounced dequasomes have been proposed in as the first compare reclast vs boniva injection mitochondriaspecific colloidal drug and dna delivery system these unique mitochondriatargeted drug carriers have been designed based on the intrinsic mitochondriotropism of amphiphilic cations with a delocalized charge center, ie on cations that compare reclast vs boniva injection accumulate at and inside mitochondria of living cells, in response to the mitochondrial membrane potential prerequisite for creating this system was the distinct selfassembly behavior of dicationic quinolinium derivatives, which are mitochondriotropic compare reclast vs boniva injection cations resembling boiaform electrolytes, ie they are symmetrical molecules with two charge centers separated by a hydrophobic chain at a relatively large distance such bola form like amphiphiles form upon sonication of aqueous suspensions cationic vesicles bolasomes are termed dqasomes when prepared from dequalinium salts the need for mitochondriaspecific delivery systems arises from the central role mitochondria play in a multitude of metabolic pathways mitochondria compare reclast vs boniva injection are vital for the cells energy metabolism and for the regulation of programmed cell death in addition, mitochondria are critically involved in the modulation of intracellular calcium concentration and the mitochondrial respiratory compare reclast vs boniva injection chain is the major source of damaging reactive oxygen species consequently, mitochondrial dysfunction either causes or at least contributes to a large number of human diseases malfunctioning mitochondria are found in several compare reclast vs boniva injection adultonset diseases including diabetes, cardiomyopathy, infertility, migraine, blindness, deafness, kidney and liver diseases and stroke the accumulation of somatic mutations in the mitochondrial genome has been suggested to be involved in aging, compare reclast vs boniva injection agerelated neurodegenerative diseases, neuromuscular diseases, as well as in cancer consequently, mitochondria are increasingly recognized as a prime target for pharmacological intervention the development of methods for selectively delivering biologically active molecules to the site of mitochondria, along with the identification of new mitochondrial molecular drug targets, will potentially launch new therapeutic approaches for the treatment of mitochondriarelated diseases, based on either the selective protection, repair or eradication of cells the self assembly behavior of bis quinolinium derivatives monte carlo computer simulations dequalinium salts fig a are dicationic mitochondriotropic compounds resembling bola form electrolytes, ie they compare reclast vs boniva injection are symmetrical molecules with two charge centers separated at a relatively large distance such symmetric bolalike structures are known from archaeal lipids, which usually consist of two glycerol backbones connected by two hydrophobic chains the selfassembly behavior of bipolar lipids from archaea has been extensively studied reviewed by gambacorta et al} it has been shown that these symmetric bipolar archaeal lipids can selfassociate into compare reclast vs boniva injection mechanically very stable monolayer membranes the most striking structural difference between dequalinium and archaeal lipids lies in the number of bridging hydrophobic chains between the polar head groups contrary to the common compare reclast vs boniva injection arachaeal lipids, in the dequalinium molecule, there is only one alkyl chain that connects the two cationic hydrophilic head groups monte carlo simulations were applied to a system of bola form amphiphiles in a coarsegrained model, in which the amphiphilic molecules consist of connected segments with each segment of the chain representing several atoms of a real amphiphilic molecule all segments of the coarse compare reclast vs boniva injection grained model are therefore either headlike hydrophilic or taillike hydrophobic as shown in fig ib the formation of molecular aggregates was studied by employing a sequence of lattice simulations in an nvt compare reclast vs boniva injection ensemble constant number of particles, n, constant volume, v, constant temperature, t, starting from an isotropic threedimensional distribution of model molecules the unoccupied lattice sites were considered waterlike, ie hydrophilic all computer compare reclast vs boniva injection simulations were done at reduced temperatures t = kgt� and interactions were modeled based on nearest neighbor repulsions e in units of kbt between hydrophobic tail segments and hydrophilic iix fig, a compare reclast vs boniva injection chemical structure of dequalmium b dequalinium after coarse graining, c snapshot from monte carlo computer simulation left, whole vesicle left right, cross section d possible conformation of singlechain bola amphiphiles left, stretched bola right, bended horse shoe heads at t � and at voi amphiphiles ie of all lattice sites were occupied with amphiphilic molecules, selfassembled vesicular structures could be found, as shown in the snapshot in fig � monte carlo simulations were also used to predict the conformational state of dequalinium within a selfassembled structure while the stretched conformation fig id, left would give rise compare reclast vs boniva injection to the formation of a monolayer, assuming the horseshoe conformation fig, id, right, it would result in the formation of a bilayer it was found that both conformations could theoretically coexist, although compare reclast vs boniva injection the balance between them appeared to be temperature dependent physicochemical characterization the selfassembly behavior, as predicted by monte carlo computer simulation, was confirmed by electron microscopy fig and photon correlation spectroscopy fig compare reclast vs boniva injection it was found that dequalinium forms upon sonication spheric appearing aggregates with a diameter between approximately and nm freeze fracture images fig , panel c show both convex and concave fracture faces these compare reclast vs boniva injection images fig electron photomicrograph of dqasomes panel a, negatively stained panel b, rotary shadowed panel c, freeze fractured fig size distribution of dqasomes strongly indicate the liposomelike aggregation of dequalinium negatively stained samples fig , panel a demonstrate that the vesicle is impervious to the stain and appears as a clear area surrounded by stain with no substructure visible rotary shadowed vesicles fig , panel b compare reclast vs boniva injection appeared very electron dense without showing any substructure structure activity relationship studies to define relationships between the structure of dequaliniumlike bola amphiphiles and their ability to form bolasomes, the selfassembly behavior of nine dequalinium derivatives with varying hydrophilic head groups and different hydrophobic tail prednisolone what is a high dose segments was evaluated it was found that the methyl group in ortho position to the quaternary nitrogen at the quinolinium ring system seems to play an essential role in the selfassembly behavior of these bola amphiphiles this seems surprising, considering the bulky and hydrophobic nature of this group while the removal of this compare reclast vs boniva injection methyl group significantly impairs the stability of formed vesicles, replacing the methyl group by an aliphatic ring system fig confers unexpected superior vesicle forming properties to this bola amphiphile vesicles made from compare reclast vs boniva injection this cyclo hexyl derivative of dequalinium are contrasted with vesicles made from dequalinium, with a very narrow size distribution of � nm which hardly changes at all, even after storage at room compare reclast vs boniva injection temperature for over months in contrast to vesicles made from dequalinium, bolasomes made from the cyclohexyl derivative are also stable upon dilution of the original vesicle preparation while dequalinium based bolasomes, slowly compare reclast vs boniva injection disintegrate over a period of several hours upon dilution, bolasomes made from the cyclohexyl compound do not show any change in size distribution following dilution it appears that bulky aliphatic residues, attached compare reclast vs boniva injection to the quinolinium heterocycle, favor selfassociation of the planar ring system it has therefore been speculated that the bulky group sterically prevents the free rotation of the hydrophilic head of the amphiphile around the ch axis fig , thus contributing to improved intermolecular interactions between the amphiphilic monomers � fig schematic illustration of the stabilizing effect of the cyclohexyl ring system black circles dqasomes as compare reclast vs boniva injection mitochondrial transfection vector the number of diseases found to be associated with defects of the mitochondrial genome has grown significantly since despite major advances in understanding mtdna, defects at the genetic and compare reclast vs boniva injection biochemical level, there is no satisfactory treatment available for a vast majority of patients objective limitations of conventional biochemical treatment, for patients with defects of mtdna, warrant the exploration of gene therapeutic compare reclast vs boniva injection approaches two different strategies for mitochondrial gene therapy are imaginable the first involves expressing a wildtype copy of the defective gene in the nucleus, with cytoplasmic synthesis and subsequent targeting of the compare reclast vs boniva injection gene product to the mitochondria allotopic expression besides the different codon usage in mitochondria, however, there are possibly four major difficulties in adapting this nuclearcytosolic approach for mitochondrial gene therapy to mammalian compare reclast vs boniva injection cells, as recently reviewed by dsouza firstly, the majority of mtdna defects involve trnas, and to date, no natural mechanism has been reported for the mitochondrial uptake of cytosolic trnas in mammalian compare reclast vs boniva injection cells secondly, it is generally agreed that the proteins encoded for by mtdna are very hydrophobic peptides, which would not be readily imported by the mitochondrial protein import machinery however, since the compare reclast vs boniva injection mitochondrial coded proteins are not equally hydrophobic, the allotopic expression of at least some of the peptides appears as possible thirdly, it has been hypothesized that some of the proteins encoded by compare reclast vs boniva injection the mitochondrion may potentially be toxic if synthesized in the cytosol fourthly, according to a hypothesis termed co location for redox regulation, the colocation of mtdna and its products may be essential compare reclast vs boniva injection for the rapid control of gene expression by the redox state in the mitochondrial matrix considering all the problems associated with the nuclear cytosolic approach, the development of methods for the direct compare reclast vs boniva injection transfection of mitochondria as an alternative approach towards mitochondrial gene therapy is warranted based on the intrinsic mitochondriotropism of dequalinium salts and the ability of dequaliniumbased vesicles, ie dqasomes, to bind and compare reclast vs boniva injection condense pdna, a strategy for the direct transfection of mitochondria within living mammalian cells has been proposed, this new strategy involves the transport of a dna mitochondrial leader sequence peptide conjugate to compare reclast vs boniva injection mitochondria using cationic mitochondriotropic vesicles dqasomes, the liberation of this conjugate from the cationic vector upon contact with the mitochondrial outer membrane, followed by dna uptake via the mitochondrial protein import machinery compare reclast vs boniva injection in a series of papers, it was then shown that dqasomes indeed fulfill all prerequisites for dqasomes as mitochondriaspecific drug and dna carriers a mitochondriaspecific dna delivery system dqasomes bind pdna forming compare reclast vs boniva injection socalled dqaplexes and protect the dna from nuclease digestion the cytotoxicity of dqasomes and of dqasomepdna complexes is comparable to nonviral transfection vectors, which are already being used in clinical trials dqasomes compare reclast vs boniva injection mediate the cellular uptake of bound pdna, most probably via nonspecific endocytosis dqasomes are endosomolytically active, thereby presumably contributing to an early endosomal release of the dqasomepdna complex dqaplexes do not release compare reclast vs boniva injection pdna upon contact with anionic phospholipids from the inner cytoplasmic membrane dqaplexes release pdna upon contact with mitochondrialike membranes, as well as upon contact with whole isolated mitochondria tested under identical experimental compare reclast vs boniva injection conditions, dqasomes were shown to transport pdn a as well as oligonucleotides to the site of mitochondria, while lipofectin was demonstrated to deliver pdna and oligonucleotides towards the nucleus plasmid dna dissociates compare reclast vs boniva injection from dqaplexes upon contact with mitochondria within living mammalian cells perhaps the most surprising finding among the above listed results is the selective dna release from dqaplexes upon contact with different membranes compare reclast vs boniva injection why do anionic phospholipids such as phosphatidylserine displace pdna from lipofectin as shown by xu and szoka, but not from dqaplexes, and why do dqaplexes in turn become destabilized upon contact with mitochondrial membranes?